Miracle Babies: An Activist Fertility Story

In 2014, after my first IVF cycle ended in a hemorrhagic cyst and my second cycle yielded only one viable embryo, the doctor told almost-35-year-old me that I should not wait too long to come back and (pay for) a third IVF cycle as my fertility was “in rapid decline.” I sobbed in the parking garage after that appointment. It was only a few short months after the stillborn of my naturally conceived son and the doctor’s “diagnosis” made me think that it would be nothing short of a miracle to have just one child.

As I write this listening to my toddler use perfectly-mimicked baby voice to talk to my newborn twins, I can report it has required more than a miracle to have my three children — actually many, many miracles. But not exactly the kind of miracles of hope that are often told of long-wanted children who “miraculously” came to be (that was our first daughter!) — our twins were the result of much more worldly miracles.

Most obviously, our boy-girl twins are miracles of science. They were conceived through in vitro fertilization — itself a miraculous technology — meaning they were created by removing my eggs (during rounds 4–6 of IVF, the two initial rounds were mainly failures) and combining them in a petri dish (literally, in glass, “in vitro”) with my husbands sperm and using “assisted hatching” to help an individual sperm fertilize an egg. We then employed advanced reproductive technology lab scientists or embryologists to help each embryo grow to 5 days old, at which point they were biopsied of just one or two cells. Those cells were then tested using preimplantation genetic screening to see if they were boys or girls and if they had any known genetic abnormalities. The resulting “healthy embryos” from our 6 rounds of IVF were cryogenically frozen and then would be thawed when we were ready to use them and implanted in my medically-prepared uterus. Incredible science and a testament to human ingenuity — a miracle when it works.

This isn’t the end of the story of science that brought us our twins, but the incredible science of IVF would be irrelevant without the “miracle” of privilege. Today, for most couples, IVF is not a covered medical benefit, but a pay-to-play resource available to those who can afford it. Since each IVF cycle is between $12–20,000 only people of some means can afford to “cure” their infertility or, like us, to avoid a devastating genetic issue. With the expensive medicines, the extra $5–10,000 for preimplantation genetic screening and time off work to have dozens of doctors appointments and each procedure, going through IVF is damn near impossible for the average family. In our case, we were able to live off one salary, put the other salary entirely toward baby-making and forget about saving — it proved worth it, but that’s because these other miracles happened and it eventually worked.

My family’s situation was especially cost prohibitive, both because of my husband’s inflexible military deployment schedule (and the military health insurance policy of no IVF coverage!*), and because of our aforementioned need for additional genetic screening. Our reason for using assisted reproductive technology in the first place was not fundamentally a “fertility” issue, and getting pregnant was not the only goal: we had to get pregnant with females (my miracle oldest daughter!) or figure out the cause of at least five generations of unexplained male fetal death. After our six IVF cycles yielded one failed implantation attempt of a female and a bunch of otherwise healthy male embryos, we needed a scientific discovery (read: miracle) to figure out why males conceived in my maternal lineage would die in mid-pregnancy. This came in the form of kind and passionate doctors. My mom sent handwritten letters to doctors she had worked with in the 1980s in Philadelphia, when she was having her 3rd and 4th unexplained male stillborns, and she got a miraculous response back from the amazing Dr. Susan Cowchock.

Dr. Cowchock is a pioneering researcher in reproductive endocrinology and genetics — specifically publishing on miscarriage — and has since become an ordained Rabbi serving as a chaplain for the Pastoral Care Service at Duke University. Dr. Cowchock’s memory of my Mom’s story and her interest in my now next generation struggle with the same genetic mystery led her to connect us to Dr. David Tester at the Mayo Clinic’s Sudden Death Genomics Lab. In the August 2017 Issue of “Prenatal Diagnosis” medical journal, Dr Tester and Dr Cowchock, along with other researchers, published the findings of the study that included gene sequencing of my family and solved the mystery: females in my family (and untold others) carry an autoimmune disorder called IPEX syndrome on our X chromosome, which does not affect the carrier female, but causes fetal death in the males that inherit this X chromosome.

With this known diagnosis, we could go back to the embryos made by our other miracle-worker doctor, the second reproductive endocrinologist we worked with after the failed cycles and “rapid fertility decline” diagnosis, Dr. David Smotrich of La Jolla IVF. Dr Smotrich compassionately and masterfully helped us produce enough good embryos to test and evaluate — and do prenatal genetic diagnosis on the males. Our story gets downright magical from this point on. When Dr. Smotrich called us with the incredible news that we had more males without IPEX than with it (giving us a great shot of having multiple children!!), and still one healthy female from IVF, we were — unbeknownst to us — already naturally pregnant with our first daughter. After years of treatments and trying to get pregnant, we would now have to wait until our natural pregnancy yielded our healthy baby girl before we would see if our miracle embryos would become children.

To be quite clear: if my naturally-conceived daughter had been a son, I would not have been able to know until the second trimester whether he had IPEX syndrome or not. At that point, I would have had a second trimester abortion rather than wait for the inevitable stillborn to happen on its own in order to save my body and soul the pain of continuing a doomed pregnancy. A sooner end to a terminal pregnancy for me would mean a faster, safer path to a child (too many stillborns meant necessary hysterectomy in my Mom)— poetically, choice yielding life. This woman desperate to be a mom would have needed the later abortion option that politicians are trying take away. So along with the privilege of resources to pay for this suite of procedures and injections to lead to my miracle of science twins, we would not be a thrilled family of five (!) without the miracles of activism and Roe v. Wade.

How does the legal right to abortion tie in to us using science to have WANTED children you ask? Well, the fact that technologies that make zygotes in petri dishes and implant SOME of them back into a uterus (usually only the ones that have the greatest chance of making it and have no known genetic abnormalities) is legal is questioned by anti-choice activists. The use of preimplantation genetic testing is called out as “creating designer babies” by some as well. If by designer, you mean in our arms, alive and healthy, then yes, people like us who want to screen out a deadly genetic disease are “baby designers”. Organizations like “Students for Life”, American Life League and the Thomas More Society have active campaigns against IVF and PGD for families like mine. “Personhood Amendments,” which are currently being pushed in many states, are a complete risk to IVF being available. All prospective parents who need some medical help to have children, or don’t know yet if they will need it, should be well aware of this threat. I am thankful for the miracles of women and men who have marched and lobbied for all the range of reproductive choice, which has included allowing us to bring our new son and daughter safely into our family.

The last two miracles we needed are closer to home. One was both the most simple and the most amazing to watch — the miracle of my parents’ resolve. They weathered four unexplained male late pregnancy losses and still were able to somehow focus on raising me in the midst of it. They sought out doctors and research to try and get answers, almost always being told that most miscarriage and stillbirth “just happens” and “we” don’t know why (a shocking 75% of repeat miscarriage have no KNOWN cause). Still, they kept trying to have children. Then, as miraculous for me, they reclaimed their untapped parental energy to use for my children, making my 3 under 2 even a remote possibility. While my husband was deployed, my older daughter still just one and I was trying to hold on to a twin pregnancy, my mom retired from her job in finance to help me and make sure I didn’t so much as lift my daughter into the crib. They also ensured that no other family would ever have the mystery of IPEX Syndrome causing repeated male fetal death — since it is now a researchable and testable cause of late male miscarriage.

Finally, the one miracle that everyone thinks about around the birth of child: the miracle of the woman’s body. Encouraging a cluster of cells to implant into her own body and then feeding and growing those cells into a baby (or babies!!) that can live outside on its own, is completely miraculous. Every birth is, of course, but birth of twins after many years of pain and trying and failure reminds me that my body didn’t “fail” me after all. As I write this, I am pumping for my twins and experiencing again how my one female body can literally keep three of us alive and growing — wow.

So, there’s one couple’s long, confusing, painful and joyous path to bringing three children into the world. It’s easy to see that the process required MANY miracles to happen — unlike the usual way to make babies. But, my takeaway aside from three healthy, beautiful children is this: should so many miracles have to happen in 2019 for women to get answers on something as “common” as pregnancy loss? Should families have to rely on financial miracles to utilize widely available science to have children? Shouldn’t we shut down any pathway that makes these miracles less likely- and yes, that includes radical anti-choice activists? Shouldn’t the women whose bodies are required for the miracle of growing and birthing the human race be the only ones to decide how and when those miracles occur?

I’m thrilled to be holding my own three miracle babies. But I’m also emboldened to help more people hold their own miracles. With healthcare discoveries seemingly happening every day, let’s keep the pressure on to understand the science of the miracle of life and make it widely available. With groups of men (and let’s not forget, some women) trying to legislate and govern women’s bodies, let’s recommit to keeping each woman in control of her own reproductive health. In 2019, let’s make it a little less miraculous for people to have the families they choose.

*I imagine that you, like me, are outraged that assisted reproductive technologies are not a covered benefit for military families. The official, congressionally-mandated policy for military health insurance reads: “TRICARE doesn’t cover non-coital reproductive procedures, services or supplies.” So, if you are in the military and need to deploy for your job, thereby missing coital reproductive windows, congress has mandated that you can’t access the medical technology currently available to help you have children. But, #supportourtroops!

Being American on World Refugee Day

June 20 is World Refugee Day

If you are a patriotic American, as I am, you agree that America is a unique country who plays an important role as an example to the world for our democracy, free press and “melting pot” populace. All of these assets benefit from our long history of welcoming and integrating refugees. “The Statue of Liberty Enlightening the World” was commissioned in 1876 to commemorate the centennial of US Declaration of Independence and on the heels of the Union prevailing in the Civil War- the statue was to honor America’s ideals of democracy and freedom and became the iconic symbol of hope to the 12 million immigrants who passed through Ellis Island, New York from 1892 and 1954. Before that, in the 1840’s, 2 million Irish refugees braved the sea passage to wash up on American shores and try to build a better life — those millions of immigrants and refugees are likely part of your heritage, like they are mine, White America.

Statue of Liberty.jpeg

 

Statue of Liberty Enlightening the World. Photo Credit: Refugee Daughter & Entrepreneur Manon DeFelice

Right now, the proud, defining American history of welcoming new people who invigorate our cities, towns and farms is at risk. Today, on World Refugee Day, there are two key ways that our government is closing our doors to refugees.

One is the devastating and immoral policy of separating children from their parents. This is an active choice by our President and his administration — it is completely avoidable and is simply cruel, racist and stupid. Cruel and racist are self-explanatory. Stupid because our centuries-long history of being a beacon for what freedom, democracy and hope mean as a nation is absolutely damaged. Our moral high ground against legitimate enemies is cut down at the knees. I observed directly how true American patriots are trying to fight back —my dear, brave San Diego friends took in Congolese refugee mother “Ms. L” to their home in the final days before she was finally reunified with her 7 year daughter. Ms. L traveled here seeking asylum and was separated from her child and incarcerated. The Administration helped clarify its own stupidity on this one: DHS Secretary Nielsen admitted the 4 month separation of mother and child was “a mistake”. (To support the lawyers who helped reunited mother and daughter, check out this GoFundMe campaign.)

But stupid doesn’t end there. The Trump administration has put forward an anti-immigrant, anti-refugee nominee, Ronald Mortensen, as Assistant Secretary of the State Department’s Bureau of Population, Migration, and Refugees (PRM). PRM is one of the most important bureaus in the State Department, and it’s Assistant Secretary in many ways functions as America’s top humanitarian diplomat. Mortensen has written off whole groups of people as criminals and terrorists and dismissed entire faith communities for showing compassion to immigrants. We need someone who will have credibility when asking other states to welcome refugees. It is stupid to suggest we can fund refugees abroad while slamming the doors on them here at home. The US has accepted just over 14,000 refugees this year so far. The administration set the refugee admissions goal for Fiscal Year 2018 at 45,000 — the lowest level in U.S. history (and since the program began in 1975). Since the program’s inception, the United States has set an average refugee admissions goal of 95,000 refugees. 99.9% of the world’s over 22.5 million refugees in the world today are hosted elsewhere, 86% by developing nations. If the US does not do more to meet its fair share, how can we ask other countries to do theirs or keep our moral global leadership?

So, to be an informed, patriotic American today — World Refugee Day — I’m joining my friends at Oxfam America and asking that Senators vote no on the Mortensen nomination and that Representatives put out a statement of concern on his nomination. Please call your senators right now to tell them to block the Mortensen nomination and uphold the American legacy of compassion for people seeking safe haven.

Dial 1–866–374–0409 and Oxfam will connect you to your senators’ offices automatically.

Then, ask them to STOP FAMILY SEPARATION.

Talking Hunger-Obesity Paradox on CBS8 San Diego

SAN DIEGO (NEWS 8) - When you hear the words “hunger” and “obesity” you usually think they are 180 degrees opposite. What if that wasn’t really the case?

In America there are around 49 million hungry American’s but the food that is given to them isn’t always the best for them.

Social enterprise powerhouse, innovator, author, food systems activist, and social entrepreneur, Ellen Gustafson joined News 8 Morning Extra to talk about how we can address the growing problems around food.

Ellen Gustafson@ellengustafson

#sandiego join me tomorrow night to talk #socent #socialentrepreneurship with @AliciaQuinn10 @HeraHub https://twitter.com/missionedgesd/status/993621113870737410 …

8:48 PM - May 8, 2018

See Ellen Gustafson's other Tweets

Want more information on this subject? Ellen Gustafson will be at Hera Hub Sorrento Valley, Wednesday night from 5:30 to 7:30 to talk about how to get the eco-system of social entrepreneurship to grow in the community. 

 Watch the interview HERE

An Old-Fashioned Birth Announcement

An Old-Fashioned Birth Announcement

My piece on Cosmo.com about a big life change:

Unlike most people in my social network, when I was pregnant, I did not share the obligatory ultrasound at the end of the first trimester, or a picture of my husband and my shoes with baby ones in the middle, or make a “reveal” video. I didn’t do all of those things because until this child was safely in my arms after delivery, I was never so comfortable to think that she would definitely arrive.

Read More

(Very) Local Action on International Women’s Day

(Very) Local Action on International Women’s Day

As an American woman on International Women’s Day, I am lucky to have the choice of which of the many issues affecting women in my community and around the world to advocate for. I don’t take this choice lightly. With women working around me still earning an average of 78 cents to the dollar our male counterparts earn for the same work and women across the economic spectrum still facing gender-related discrimination and violence, I am aware that we still have a long road to travel to true gender equality.

Read More

In 2015, Let’s Snack on Some Hope

It’s a sign of the times that Mark Bittman is signing off from his post as theNew York Times food opinion writer this month (double pun, intended). Although he had been writing about food, restaurants, and recipes for the Times for years, Bittman started a fresh chapter at the Grey Lady at the start of 2011, by taking up the topic of food politics and food system issues in a new column.

Read More

The Danger Behind Processed Foods Is More Serious Than We Ever Imagined

The Danger Behind Processed Foods Is More Serious Than We Ever Imagined

I studied international relations, security, and warfare for four years, but it wasn’t until I left college that I made the connection between hunger and terrorism. Let’s backtrack a bit for some context: In the early fall of 2001, I was in my senior year at Columbia University as a political science major with a focus on global security policy. Specifically, I had become interested in the way the U.S. and the world work to avoid war, and ensure security in the modern world.

Read More

Good News: Butter Isn’t as Bad for You as You Thought

Good News: Butter Isn’t as Bad for You as You Thought

It's back on our plates and palates ... and new science suggests it's not as bad for you as everyone thought.

For years, butter—along with other types of full-fat dairy and meat—has been taboo for health-conscious eaters. With diligence, we’ve spooned our fat-free yogurt, sipped our skinny flavored lattes and booted steak from our plates, believing that saturated fat would make us fat and put us on track for heart disease.

Read More

10 Food Choices That Will Change Your LIFE

10 Food Choices That Will Change Your LIFE

Our flawed food system has led to dual epidemics: hunger and obesity. In the past 30 years, we've seen the repercussions of global changes, and they aren't pretty. We're closing in on 1 billion people going hungry—and an even greater number are already overweight. As a nation, we've traditionally focused on making food fast, convenient, and widely available rather than good for us.

Read More